The partnership expansion announced Thursday will add 50 DA40s and six DA42s to the Republic Airways training program. 

• READ MORE: UNSW School of Aviation Expands Diamond Fleet

According to Diamond Aircraft, the trainers are slated to bolster programs at new LIFT Academy campuses in Galveston, Texas; Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; and at Tuskegee University in Alabama.

“These aircraft are chosen for their advanced technology and fuel efficiency, which not only align with our sustainability efforts but also closely mirror the aircraft our pilots will operate at Republic Airways,” said Ed Bagden, director of flight operations and academic programs at LIFT Academy. “This strategic expansion ensures that LIFT Academy continues to offer industry-leading training, preparing our students with a seamless transition to their careers as airline pilots.”

• READ MORE: Purdue, LIFT Academy Partner to Tackle Commercial Pilot Need

The Diamond DA40 piston single is powered by a 180 hp Lycoming IO-360 engine and comes equipped with Garmin G1000 NXi avionics. The aircraft offers a top cruise speed of 152 knots, 934 nm range, and maximum useful load of 900 pounds. The DA42 advanced piston twin is powered by 168 hp Austro Engine AE300 powerplants. It offers a top cruise speed of nearly 200 knots, 1,225 nm range, and maximum useful load of 1,276 pounds.

The post LIFT Academy Makes ‘Significant Fleet Expansion’ with Diamond Aircraft appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Today’s Top Pick is a 2007 Diamond DA42.

Ever since its debut in the early 2000s, the Diamond DA42 light twin has attracted the interest of flight schools seeking economical multiengine trainers. They are also attractive to individual private pilots who wish to move up to the light twin category while keeping operating costs under control.

The aircraft’s diesel engines are a focal point, especially for operators who prefer jet fuel over avgas. The DA42, with its composite structure, advanced avionics, and other modern features, also offers pilots the added sense of security that comes with a relatively new airframe and low hours.

For private pilots who regularly use their aircraft for business or long-distance family travel, possibly over long stretches of water or mountainous terrain, having a second engine can be an added measure of security worth contemplating. The DA42’s relative fuel efficiency, forgiving handling characteristics and impressive all-around performance make it a strong candidate for anyone seeking a capable personal aircraft.        

This 2007 DA42 has 950 hours on the airframe and on both Continental CD135 engines and MT composite propellers since new.

The panel features the Garmin G1000-integrated glass cockpit with dual GDU 1040s with 10-inch screens for PFD and MFD, GEA 71 airframe/engine interface unit, dual GIA 63 Nav/Com/GPS radios, GMA 1347 digital audio system, GTX 345R transponder with ADS-B In and Out, GRS 77 AHRS, GMU 44 magnetometer, GDC 74 air data computer, WX500 StormScope, and Avidyne TAS 60X active traffic.

Additional equipment includes a TKS deicing system, oxygen system, long-range fuel tanks, lightning protection system, HID landing and taxi lights, and automatic three-point safety belts on all four seats.

Pilots looking for a modern, economical light twin for travel or training should consider this 2007 Diamond DA42, which is available for $495,000 on AircraftForSale.

You can arrange financing of the aircraft through FLYING Finance. For more information, email info@flyingfinance.com.

• FLYING Magazine: Diamond DA42 Twin Makes First SAF Flight
• FLYING Magazine: Lufthansa Commits to Eco-Friendly Training with Diamond DA42 Twins
• FLYING Magazine: Emirates Expands Training Fleet With Diamond DA42-VI
• Plane & Pilot: Plane & Pilot 2017 Buyer’s Guide: Piston Twins
• AVweb: FAA: Diamond DA42 Twin Star OK for Known Icing
• AVweb: Lyc-Powered DA42 Certified in Canada
• AVweb: Diamond Offers Continental Option for DA42

The post This 2007 Diamond DA42 Is Fuel Efficient ‘AircraftForSale’ Top Pick appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

In contrast, all light sport aircraft (LSA), experimental amateur-built airplanes, and warbirds are issued special certificates. In my view, the rule can be divided into two main parts: airplane descriptions and capabilities, and pilot certificates, technician privileges, and operating limitations. In short, airplanes or people.

For airplanes, the NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) felt like Christmas in July, granting many capabilities industry and pilot member organizations had sought over some years of negotiation. The people part describes who gets to fly and maintain these MOSAIC LSAs and under what rules. This latter section inspired greater concern.

Airplanes: What We Gained

Here’s the list of what FAA offered and how each changed:

Gross weight: LSAs have been limited to 1,320 pounds (land) or 1,430 pounds (water). Under MOSAIC, the weight limit is removed and clean stall constrains size so the aircraft remains what FAA sought: those “easy to fly, operate, and maintain.” It is expected that weight can rise to 3,000 pounds depending on the design.

Stall speed: Presently, LSAs cannot stall faster than 45 knots. This will be raised 20 percent to 54 knots, but this is clean stall, the purpose of which is to limit aircraft size and difficulty. It has no relation to landing speed or slow-flight qualities. This more than doubled the potential size, hence a new term, “MOSAIC LSA.”

Four seats: LSAs are presently limited by definition to two seats. This rises to four in a MOSAIC LSA, but if operated by someone using sport pilot certificate privileges, then only one passenger can be carried. A private certificate with medical may fill all four seats, assuming weight and balance allows.

Retractable gear: Light sport aircraft have been fixed gear only, except for amphibious models. Now any MOSAIC LSA can be retractable. Several imported LSAs already offer retractable options in other countries.

Adjustable prop: LSAs were allowed only ground-adjustable props. Now a MOSAIC LSA can have an in-flight adjustable prop. Such equipment on similar aircraft is common in other countries.

250 knot max speed: An LSA was limited by definition to 120 knots at full power. Now the speed limit matches all other aircraft below 10,000 feet: 250 knots. No one expected such a large expansion, but now retractable and adjustable props make more sense.

Rotary expansion: After 20 years of waiting, fully built gyroplanes will be allowed. That followed years of advocacy effort, but when the opposition finally yielded, the FAA also granted helicopters.

Electric or hybrid: Because the FAA did not want turbine LSAs in 2004, it specified reciprocating engines, unintentionally knocking out electric motors that few were considering at the time. In fixing the definition to allow electric, the agency will also permit hybrids. Examples are already flying in Europe.

Turbine: Perhaps turbine engines were harder to operate 20 years ago when LSA were defined, but today they are seen as simpler, and the FAA will allow them. Turbine-powered MOSAIC LSA candidates are already flying in Europe.

Multiple engines/motors: The LSA has been limited to a single engine by definition. That constraint is removed, although no language was given to address how the pilot qualifies.

Aerial work: The Light Aircraft Manufacturers Association (LAMA) lobbied for MOSAIC LSAs to be permitted to do forms of aerial work, although not passenger or cargo hauling. The FAA has granted this opportunity to the manufacturers, which can specify what operations they will permit. A commercial pilot certificate will be required.

One downside to all these goodies? Each will increase the price. The good news? Present-day LSAs offer lower prices and have proven enjoyable and dependable. Many LSAs are fine as they are and have no need to change.

A lot of LSA producers already meet higher weights in other countries where permitted. They are merely reduced on paper to meet U.S. standards. It should be straightforward for them to redeclare meeting all MOSAIC-level ASTM standards to qualify for higher weights.

The only question is how far backward compatible they can go for aircraft in the field over which they have had no control for some time. It’s an industry question to resolve, and it will swiftly be handled to aid sales.

People and Areas of Concern

Medicals: Lots of questions surround one of the principal benefits of LSA operation: the lack of requirement for an aviation medical if operating as a sport pilot. More specifically, pilots want to fly larger aircraft using these privileges, meaning no medical certificate, or BasicMed, instead using the driver’s license as evidence of their medical fitness.

To keep within their budget, many pilots wish to buy (or keep flying) legacy GA aircraft such as the Cessna 150, 172, 177, and some 182s, plus certain Pipers, Diamonds, Champions, or other brands. Many of the latter aircraft are too heavy to allow such privilege today. MOSAIC appears to change that, but without presenting compelling evidence that possession of a medical assures a flight proceeds safely, the FAA nonetheless clings to this premise. Many assert the occurrence of medical problems sufficient to upset a flight or cause an accident are incredibly small in number.

Stall speed: Most NPRM readers agree that it was a worthy solution to use 54 knots clean stall as a means to limit the size of the airplane and to keep it within the FAA’s mantra of LSAs being “easy to fly, operate, and maintain.”

However, many respondents note that adding just a couple knots to that limit will allow several more airplanes that some wish to buy and fly under MOSAIC rules. Note that the 54-knot reference is not related to landing speeds or slow flight, where lift-enhancing devices like flaps would normally be used.

Some pilots asked if adding vortex generators could reduce stall speed enough to qualify. The problem lies in proving a slower stall speed was achieved. Stall (V_S1) printed in the POH will be the standard about compliance.

Several pilots have complained about use of calibrated versus indicated airspeed for the stall limit, but this is another matter that might be clarified after the comment period.

Endorsements: One of the significant lessons learned in 20 years of pilots operating LSAs is the so-called magic of endorsements. Instead of asking pilots to receive training, take a knowledge test and possibly an oral exam, followed by a practical flight test, they can just go get trained for added skills from an instructor who then endorses their logbook accordingly, and they’re good to go. This puts a significant burden on flight instructors to do their jobs well, but that’s already the situation.

The NPRM already refers to the use of endorsements for retractable gear training or adjustable prop training, and many believe that expanding endorsements to all privileges described in the MOSAIC proposal has merit.

Noise: For the first time, the NPRM introduced noise requirements that encompass several pages. Coincidentally, the LSA sector is already one of the quietest in the airborne fleet.

This is partly because of European noise regulations that have been in place for a long time, motivating quieter engine and exhaust system development. However, LSAs are also quieter because the powerplants are modern, thanks to the faster approval process implied by industry consensus standards.

The industry was not pleased about the noise proposal, as these requirements add burden without identifiable benefit. Nonetheless, the situation might be handled through the ASTM process more quickly and still satisfy political demands.

Night: MOSAIC’s language invigorated many readers when the NPRM expressed support for a sport pilot to fly at night—with proper training and a logbook endorsement. Then the proposal refers to other FAA regulations that require BasicMed or a medical. If you must have a medical, you are not exercising the central privilege of a sport pilot. Why suggest that a sport pilot can do things that are blocked by other regulations? This conflict should be resolved.

This is one of several aspects of the NPRM that many describe as “inconsistencies,” where one part of MOSAIC appears to restrict another part, often for unclear reasons. Such observations lead many to declare the NPRM looks “rushed to market.” Hopefully, most problems can be addressed in the post-comment period.

When surveyed about why night privileges are valued, most pilots wanted to be able to complete a cross-country flight with a landing after dark.

IFR/IMC: Contrary to what many think, the FAA has never prohibited LSAs from IFR/IMC operation. It is the lack of an ASTM standard to which manufacturers can declare compliance that prevents such sales. (Some special LSA owners elect a change to experimental LSA status and can then file IFR, assuming they have a rating, are current, and the airplane is properly equipped.)

However, as with night operations, many LSA owners report higher-level pilot certificates often including instrument ratings, and they would like to be able to use their LSAs to get through a thin cloud layer.

Maintenance and TBOs: The maintenance community has found several objections within the NPRM. It appears that changes could cause a loss of privilege for LSA owners who have taken training to perform basic maintenance on their own LSAs.

In addition to altering the privileges of light sport repairman mechanic (LSRM) certificate holders, MOSAIC adds capabilities such as electric propulsion, hybrid, turbine, and powered-lift devices, which leaves the mechanic-training industry guessing where to start. Some organizations wonder if it’s worth the investment to create appropriate courses with uncertain privilege at the end.

Indeed, eight training organizations suggested they would petition for an extension to the comment period. It was successful, so the extension will delay the expected arrival of the finished MOSAIC regulation. Absent any extension, the FAA has repeatedly said 16 months were needed, equating to the end of 2024 or early 2025.

One group creatively suggested using add-on training modules to solve the problem in much the same way that endorsements can be used to solve pilot training enhancements.

Lack of sector expertise: The FAA knows a great deal about conventional, three-axis airplanes but far less about so-called “alternative LSAs.” For machines that use different control systems or operate substantially differently than airplanes—weight shift and powered parachutes come to mind—some industry experts believe a better system is to authorize an industry organization to manage these sectors. This has been common throughout Europe for many years and could work well in the U.S.

In a document of its size, some errors will arise and some clarifications will be needed. It is only a proposal after all. Pilots can comment on certain aspects but will have little idea how the FAA can or will solve various points, even if they offer solutions.

This frustrates some readers and can cause uncertainty about a pending or planned airplane purchase. In turn, purchase-decision delays frustrate airplane manufacturers. That’s the precarious terrain surrounding new regulations. Such comments on regulation are part of the American way, where the citizens can be part of the process. Here’s your chance to speak and be heard.

This column first appeared in the November 2023/Issue 943 of FLYING’s print edition.

The post Pilots Have Questions When It Comes to MOSAIC appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

While the company’s design philosophy driving towards higher levels of safety isn’t unique, its approach is. Crashworthiness is key—particularly in the containment of fuel in order to mitigate fire conflagration following an accident that breaches tank-carrying parts of the airframe. Isolation of the tank between spars and thoughtful placement of fuel lines have thus far resulted in an excellent post-accident safety record with a low fire risk. Perhaps introducing fuel to a gliding airframe that had none of it before made early engineers particularly conscious of its objective hazards.

Also, the aircraft across the model range tend to be excellent gliders—not a surprise, given the company’s heritage. While the DA20s and DA40s use washout to capture low-speed performance, the light twins use winglets. Comparatively speaking, the DA50 RG’s are rather short and sweet—and VGs ahead of the aileron on the leading edge of the outboard wing section keep airflow attached over the control surface throughout the stall. Roll response during the stall condition proved this out.

READ MORE: We Fly: Diamond DA50 RG, the High Performance Retract that Shines

All-composite construction lends a lightness of being, and this too began with the H36/ HK36/DA20s and finds a high level of expression in the DA50 RG with its complex curves and bubblicious cabin. We took a tour through the factory, and it all begins in the Diamond Aircraft Industries Composite facility. Most of the DA50 RG is formed from wet lay-up prepreg carbon fiber material with a small percentage from dry vacuum process for parts that need to be transparent. The production lines in Wiener Neustadt put DA50 RGs combined in the same line with DA42s and DA62, withthe DA40 traveling alongside in a separate line. More production takes place in London, Ontario, at DAI Canada, of the DA42, DA62, and DA40.

WATCH: We Fly the Diamond DA50 RG

At present, all DA20s are built in China—the model has held Chinese type certification since 2004—under license from DAI’s parent company, Wafeng Aviation Industry Co., Ltd. to Wuhu Diamond, Ltd.. Co-founder Christian Dries sold DAI (including DAI Austria, DAI Canada, and Austro Engines GmbH) in late 2017 upon his impending retirement, with no relatives ready to take the helm. But he maintains his connection with the company—as he came in for lunch at the attached Katana Kafe during our late April visit, a regular sight.

The post The Diamond Aircraft Story Continues to Evolve appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The icing on the lebkuchen? I’m with Martin Scherrer, head of flight operations and training for Diamond Aircraft—and we’re climbing away in the new Diamond DA50 RG. We’re speeding towards Diamond’s EU home of Wiener Neustadt, Austria, just south of Vienna, but we have cameras on board the DA62 that’s chasing us. We plan a couple of special stops along the way—those mountains keep soaring up ahead—the German Alps. It would be so wrong not to twirl a couple of turns around a chateau—Neuschwanstein, that inspired a Disney castle, for one. We’ll also tuck into the deep valley that hosts Hallstatt, on the edge of Hallstätter See, often voted the prettiest town in the world for its postcard-envy setting.

But the view from above ranks as the most stunning. As we fly over Salzberg, I can’t help but hum a few bars from the Sound of Music… with a twist: “I am sixteen going on seventeen… time to get my pilot’s license…”

Delivered

While the sweet and swift retract has been type certificated under the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) since September 2020, FAA validation came nearly to a halt during COVID. The company has delivered 38 into EASA-land while awaiting certification stateside. Diamond anticipates that to come through this summer—and one of the production models departs soon for a U.S. tour in coordination with that milestone.

READ MORE: Diamond Aircraft Receives FAA Type Certification on DA50 RG

No small part of the validation process lies in the ac- ceptance of the new Continental CD-300 jet-A burning diesel engine under the DA50 RG’s complex cowl, which looks as though an engineer blew globes in hot glass—fiberglass—and stuck them in place to shroud the massive powerplant. We’ll see glimpses of that engine during our walkaround, but during our visit to the production line a couple of days later we’ll get to contemplate its intricate architecture as it sits on serial numbers 40 and 41 about to leave the line for flight testing.

The FADEC-controlled CD-300 is the largest Continental diesel in the series to make it to EASA certification—and all 560 pounds of it comprise a substantial percentage of the DA50 RG’s empty weight. It potentially creates a long view down the nose for the pilot—but instead of being in the way, I found it helped me gauge my sight picture both during high work and landings.

WATCH: We Fly the Diamond DA50 RG

For pilots seeing the big CD-300 for the first time, it takes a moment to orient yourself. The CD-300 is liquid-cooled rather than air-cooled. Plus, a diesel engine is self-igniting, meaning there are no magnetos—so the combustion chambers must be heated to a certain temperature and maintain that baseline in order to light off. From the aircraft flight manual: “The bypass cooling circuit (cabin heat exchanger) is always active. The short cooling circuit is active at low cooling temperatures.” This ensures that a cold engine will warm up quickly, and also creates a safety benefit, using coolant rather than exhaust gas. When the coolant temperature reaches 183 degrees Fahrenheit, the external cooling circuit is activated by a valve.

Look at the large intercooler radiators on the nose and follow the orange ducting to that system inside—indicating that the CD-300 features a turbocharging system as well, driven somewhat traditionally by exhaust gas collected from a manifold. Excess gases bypass the turbine via a FADEC-controlled wastegate. A pressure sensor behind the compressor allows FADEC to calculate the correct position of the waste gate’s valve.

Diamond has had a long path to certification on its retract—15 years—because of the issues plaguing early engine partner Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH, which originally produced the Centurion line from which the CD-300 was derived, generally speaking. Thielert went public in 2005, but by 2008 had declared bankruptcy, with its founder Frank Thielert jailed during the fracas. Centurion Aircraft Engines formed from that basis, and Continental Motors purchased those assets, bringing the 300-hp engine in development under the CD-300 moniker.

And there are interesting times ahead as the CD-300 enters service beyond the EU. The in-family engine OEM Austro Engines has had success in the DA42 and DA62, and we noted a couple of operational distinctions between the AE330s in the DA62 when we flew it.

A. The Garmin G1000 NXi suite features ESP and a blue Level button in the lower center of the instrument panel, which returns the aircraft to straight and level on autopilot, maintaining pitch and roll modes when pressed.

B. The fuel system is unique to the DA50 RG and sup- ports the operations of the CD-300 diesel engine. It draws from the left wing tank through a mechanical feed pump into the injectors, which deliver only a portion of that fuel to the combustion chambers. The unused diesel returns via a common fuel line to the right tank, or as determined by the fuel selector position.

C. The load level is managed by the power lever, which meters fuel required, controls prop pitch and feathering, and adjusts the twin turbochargers in accordance with demand, given the altitude and flight condition.

D. The front seats can recline somewhat, but proper pedal position is adjusted electrically on a long rail that accommodates a wide range of pilot sizes.

E. The optional flight management system keypad tucks into the center armrest console and must be stowed for takeoff and landing.

Fuel System

It takes a dedicated system to deliver fuel to a CD series engine, one that’s plumbed and pumped quite a bit dif- ferently than the standard left-right-both (sometimes) that gasoline engines in light singles use. There’s a tank in each wing, but instead of thinking of them as left and right, they are the main and the aux.

The powerplant draws fuel from the main tank in the left wing through an electrical feed pump to the engine-driven mechanical pump into the injectors, which deliver only a portion of that fuel to the combustion chambers. The unused diesel returns via a common fuel line to the main tank via the aux tank for heat exchange, or as determined by the fuel selector position. Normal on the fuel selector draws from the main; the Emergency position takes fuel directly from the aux tank. The Off position cuts off the fuel supply entirely.

Since you’re drawing from the main and only returning part of that fuel to that tank, a fuel imbalance will grow beyond the airplane’s ability to maintain lateral balance. Before the 9-gallon limit, the pilot turns on an electric transfer pump to move fuel from the right wing to the left—but not during takeoff and landing.

Flight Controls

My overall impression of the airplane’s handling finds a good balance between the nimbleness you desire for hands-on flying—to tackle a crosswind, for example— with the stability to make it quite comfortable on a long cross-country flight off the autopilot.

The length of the stick and its connection to the rest of the flight control system may have a lot to do with this. I move regularly between aircraft that utilize a yoke and one with a center stick, and find little transition time is needed for me—but the yoke-controlled aircraft is more of a cross-country machine, while the one in which I use a stick is highly maneuverable.

The stick in the DA50 RG is also a bit taller than the one I usually fly with, putting the push-to-talk trigger-style button and electric trim split rocker switch a wee bit of a stretch for my short thumb if I rested my left arm on my leg. It took me a couple of flights to find the sweet spot—and maybe because this was an almost-confirming prototype, it explains why the stick in the DA62 I also flew during my visit felt a bit shorter and thus just slightly easier to find that spot on.

However—when we got out of the cross-country mode on my first flight from EDNY to LOAN and into a bit of stationkeeping, I really appreciated the stick and its direct feedback—in a straight line to the control cable bellcrank rather than the up and down movement of the yoke. These are fine details, but I think a clear reason why some pilots prefer a given airplane over another.

READ MORE: The Diamond Aircraft Story Continues to Evolve

The idea came home to me the next time I got into the TB-30 model I sometimes fly—that direct control gives confidence in both aggressive and finely-tuned maneuvering flight. In the DA50 RG, it’s somewhat dampened by the aileron actuation—and a bridge between worlds.

Therefore my final assessment makes sense—that if you are looking for a solid performer that makes you feel like you’re still flying an airplane rather than pushing buttons and managing systems, the DA50 RG will resonate with you.

Diamond aircraft take their DNA from the gliders that formed the core product line when the Austrian OEM first launched its H36 then the Super Dimona HK36 in 1980 (see “The Diamond Story”). One out- come? Advanced aerodynamics in the wings add significantly to the DA50 RG’s excellent low-speed handling characteristics and reduced approach speeds.

For example, the DA50’s flaps consist of two pieces—an inner part attached to the center wing, and the outer part to the wing itself. The sections are independently pushrod controlled, and they slide out and back to produce two tiered channels for the air to flow through, ensuring adhesion to the upper surface of the flap along with the increased camber for the wing overall.

Cross-Country Cruising

The DA50 RG has been one of the first new single-engine retracts to hit the category—with the Pipistrel Panthera also currently seeking approval beyond EASA—since the FAA granted type certification to the Mooney Ovation 3 in 2007. Besides looking great, there’s one solid reason to put the gear in the wells—speed.

In cruise, that speed comes to call. The airplane has an operating altitude maximum of 20,000 feet, but most pilots will flight plan below the oxygen-required flight levels—so it’s a good thing that the DA50 RG finds a sweet spot at 10,000 feet msl, where it easily makes its 172 ktas book speed. We conducted formation work for much of our 2.3 hours from EDNY to LOAN at lower altitudes, like 7,500 feet, and ticked off true airspeeds between 160 and 167 ktas at 90 percent load.

Diamonds burn diesel for reasons of efficiency and economy—as well as the ability to source fuel virtually anywhere—and so we also pulled the CD-300 back into economy mode. At 60 percent load, 5,500 feet msl, and ISA plus 8 Celsius, we made 156 ktas, above book—and using 10.1 gph. Pulling back to a loitering speed of 119 ktas and 45 percent load at that altitude and condition, and fuel flow drops to 7.9 gph. Our precise Austrian friends have built on this efficiency philosophy throughout their model lineup, and the DA50 RG fits right in.

On Landings

Sight picture on landing feels straightforward not only for a pilot transitioning up the Diamond food chain, but also from other four-seat fixed-gear aircraft like high- wing Cessnas and the PA-28 series. With a substantial engine out front, you have cowl references to use while determining your height above the runway (the DA50 RG definitely sits tall on its gear) without cheating a glance to the side. I found it easy to find the mains for a normal landing, as well as during the specialty take- offs and landings we performed.

Approach speeds fall firmly where you’d expect them to in the category, and the runway at Wiener Neustadt—a VFR-only airport at 896 feet msl—is 1,067 meters (3,500 feet) long, which the airplane handles easily, flaps or not.

In fact, the no-flap landing demonstrates the power of the flaps, but also the general characteristics of the wing itself. Maintaining a higher approach speed of 94 knots indicated (versus 85 kias with takeoff flaps and 77 kias with full flaps) translates into more runway used—but still comfortably within touch-and-go territory on that 1,000 meters of pavement with a ground roll near book of half the runway distance (1,700 feet) at our lighter takeoff weight (roughly 3,950 pounds, about 500 pounds below the max takeoff weight of 4,407 pounds).

A short-field landing test with full flaps easily placed us with a ground roll of less than 600 feet—the 17 knots less for VREF plus good hydraulically actuated disc brakes combined to improve pilot confidence when taking the DA50 RG into airports of modest scale.

Haul the Whole Fam

We had four healthy adults and a week’s worth of show gear on board the DA50 RG on our departure from EDNY—along with full tanks. There was no compromise required. And the three seats across in the back made for a very comfortable ride for our colleagues enjoying the Alpine traverse. This was one of the more surprising revelations of flying the new model. The time to market with the right engine has meant time for Diamond’s engineering to dial out really important parameters—and the loading capability is one big one.

There is a combination of compartments in the rear cabin to work with, up to 198 pounds total.

For pilots completely satisfied with the DA50 RG’s range and carry-all flexibility, it could certainly prove a worthy companion for a long relationship. But with its honest low-speed handling enticing you to hand-fly more often, and a landing attitude common to both previous aircraft and what you might step up to—say, the Epic E1000 GX, Daher TBM, or Piper M-Series turboprops—it sets the stage for more real piloting to come. 

DIAMOND DA50 RG

Price, as tested: $1,237,650
Engine: Continental Diesel CD-300
Propeller: MT Propeller MTV-12-D/210-56, wood with composite coating, three-blade constant speed
Horsepower: 300 hp maximum power, 272 hp maximum continuous power
Seats: 5
Length: 30.31 ft.
Height: 9.69 ft.
Wingspan: 44 ft.
Wing Area: 176.85 sq. ft.
Wing Loading: 24.91 lb./sq. ft.
Power Loading: 14.69 lb./hp @ 300 hp
Cabin Width: 4 ft. 2.8 in.
Cabin Height: 4 ft. 2.4 in.
Max Zero Fuel Weight: 4,189 lb.
Max Takeoff Weight: 4,407 lb.
Empty Weight: 3,175 lb. (depending on options) Max Baggage Weight: 165 lb./33 lb.; 198 lb. total separated into 4 areas/compartments Useful Load: 1,232 lb. (depending on options) Max Fuel: Usable: 49; Total 51.5 USG
Max Operating Altitude: 20,000 ft.
Max Rate of Climb, MTOW, ISA, sea level: 786 fpm Economy Cruise Speed at 60% Power: 156 ktas, 2,300 rpm, ISA, 10,000 ft., 10.1 gph
Max Cruise Speed: 90% Power: 172 ktas, 2,300 rpm, ISA, 10,000 ft.
Max Range: 750 nm with 30-min. reserve
Stall Speed, Flaps Up: 71 kcas @MTOW
Stall Speed, Full Flaps: 58 kcas @MTOW
Takeoff Over 50 Ft. Obs: (ISA, sea level, MTOW) 2,408 ft.
Landing Over 50 Ft. Obs: (ISA, sea level, max landing wt.) 2,224 ft.

This article first appeared in the June 2023/Issue 938 of FLYING’s print edition.

The post We Fly: Diamond DA50 RG, the High-Performance Retract That Shines appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

The post Watch: We Fly Diamond DA50 RG appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

For our main features, we fly the Diamond DA62 piston twin, which has hit a market sweet spot with more than 270 delivered. We also look at what it takes to update your avionics to new in a popular legacy twin—the Piper Twin Comanche—and give you tips for achieving the same level of upgrade for your own airplane.

Also, inside our pages, we celebrate 20 years of the Recreational Aviation Foundation with a special work project in Idaho. We also kick off the ski season with a flight to Truckee/Tahoe Airport (KTRK) in the Sierra Nevada to whet your appetite for winter flying destinations. Plus, we give you all of the columns and proficiency articles you’ve come to expect from our deep bench of expert contributors—so make sure you’ve subscribed. You’ll also get a chance to win in our Ultimate FLYING Giveaway!

The post Choose Your Next FLYING Cover appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Today’s Top Pick is a 2005 Diamond DA40 F.

The Diamond DA40 has been around for more than 20 years but is still considered a modern design when compared with much of the GA fleet. Functionally this four-seater with a composite structure takes over where older, more conventional models like the Cessna 172 and Piper PA-28 leave off. Like those aircraft, the DA40 is well suited for training student pilots while also making a good personal airplane.

The DA40 has gone through several changes and upgrades during its development, and today it is a popular model with flight schools and as an ideal first aircraft for new pilots. The aircraft is available with a familiar Lycoming IO-360 engine or an Austro Engine AE300 diesel that runs on jet-A.

This 2005 DA40 has 2,503 hours on the airframe and 475 hours on its Lycoming engine. The panel includes G1000 avionics and a GTX 33 transponder. Its paint and interior are original.

Pilots looking for a modern four-seat single that is suited for training and travel should take a serious look at this 2005 Diamond DA40 F, which is available for $250,000 on AircraftForSale.

You can arrange financing of the aircraft through FLYING Finance. For more information, email info@flyingfinancial.com.

• FLYING Magazine: Diamond’s DA40 NG Just Might Be What the General Aviation Market Is Clamoring For
• FLYING Magazine: Urbe Aero Flight Academy Expands Fleet with Diamond Aircraft
• FLYING Magazine: Diamond Offers a Year’s ‘Free Flying’ for DA40 Buyers
• Plane & Pilot: Diamond DA40
• Plane & Pilot: Diamond DA40 XLS: Premier Edition
• The Aviation Consumer: Diamond DA40 Star

The post 2005 Diamond DA40 F Is a Well-Rounded ‘Aircraft For Sale’ Top Pick appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Today’s Top Pick is a 2018 Diamond DA62

There are certain things pilots expect when flying traditional piston twins, including impressive climb, load-carrying capacity, and a sense of safety because of the second engine. If one of the engines loses power, however, what follows can have the intense feel of a full-on emergency as the pilot has to identify, verify, and secure the failed engine quickly while making a series of adjustments to throttle, prop, mixture controls, and pitch, roll and yaw controls to maintain altitude and control.

The Diamond DA62 is known for making an engine failure less of an event by automating much of the process required to secure the failed engine. All the pilot has to do is turn off the engine master switch, and the electronic engine control system feathers the prop automatically. This gives the pilot more time to focus on maintaining controlled flight without unexpected departures from a straight and level attitude.

Speaking of engines, the DA62’s liquid-cooled power plants burn jet-A and are surprisingly fuel efficient. When someone says DA62 burns 15 gallons an hour, they are talking about both engines, not “per side.” It occurred to me that this twin burns about as much fuel per hour as my single-engine Commander 114B.

This DA62 has just 631 hours on the airframe and both engines. It has always been hangared and comes with a number of options including seven-passenger seating, FMS keypad, a TKS ice protection system, and an oxygen system with cannulas and hoses. 

The modern panel includes an integrated Garmin G1000 NXi, including two Garmin GDU 105X PFD and MFD flight displays, Garmin GEA 71 Airframe/Engine Interface Unit, and two Garmin GIA 63 WASS COM/NAV/GPS/GS/LOC.

Pilots looking for the safety of a modern light twin can check out this DA62, which is available on AircraftForSale.

You can arrange financing of the airplane through FLYING Financial Group. For more information, email info@flyingfinancial.com.

• FLYING Magazine: We Fly: Diamond DA62
• FLYING Magazine: Transition Training: The Diamond DA62
• Plane & Pilot: Ultimate Piston Twin: Diamond DA62
• Plane & Pilot: Our 2021 Roundup Of Light Twin Aircraft
• The Aviation Consumer: Diamond DA62: Perfection at a Price

The post Today’s Top AircraftForSale Pick: 2018 Diamond DA62 appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

• READ MORE: Wildfire Smoke Descends on Oshkosh

• READ MORE: Cessna Shows Off New Interiors for High-Wing Singles at Oshkosh

• READ MORE: Inside NASA’s Super Guppy

• READ MORE: Daher Celebrates Milestone TBM Deliveries, Kodiak Success

• READ MORE: Diamond Aircraft Receives FAA Certification for DA50 RG

• READ MORE: King Schools Launch New Aviation Maintenance Program 

• READ MORE: FLYING Reveals Innovation Award Series for 2023

• READ MORE: Watch: We Fly Garmin Autoland King Air 200

The post Oshkosh 2023 In Pictures appeared first on FLYING Magazine.